Saturday, April 30, 2011

Sandy Neighbors Seek To Derail TRAX Park and Ride

Sandy neighbors seek to derail TRAX park and ride

Published: Friday, April 29, 2011 5:14 p.m. MDT
PRINT | FONT + - 
SANDY — LeeAnn Evans accepts that she can't stop oncoming trains.
But she's not afraid to stand in the way of cars or buses.
Evans and several of her neighbors are hoping to derail the Utah Transit Authority's plans for a park-and-ride lot to serve the now-under-construction TRAX station at 11400 South and about 400 East.
They say putting a parking lot in an otherwise residential area would be detrimental to the neighborhood.
"The things we're concerned most about are the increase in traffic and crime, especially with the amount of children we have in this area," Evans said.
She and her neighbors will have a chance to make their case to the Sandy City Council on Tuesday. The group has appealed the Jan. 6 decision of the Planning Commission that gave UTA the green light to build the park and ride.
"We cannot prevent UTA from having a (TRAX) stop there," Evans said, "but we can have some input on if there's a park-and-ride lot there or not."
Neighbors have reluctantly surrendered to the reality that trains will be picking up and dropping off passengers near their homes. UTA owns the right of way along the so-called Draper Transit Corridor, and locating a station at 11400 South is the transit authority's prerogative.
That shifts the battle to the grassy field just west of the construction site, where neighbors' voices could play a role in how passengers get to and from the station.
UTA owns most of the eastern half of that field and plans to build a 222-stall parking lot there to support the TRAX station. It would become a 248-stall park and ride if UTA acquires a section of the property owned by Sandy.
Unlike its construction of the station, UTA needed city approval in the form of a conditional-use permit to build the park and ride. In January, the Sandy Planning Commission unanimously granted that approval, subject to a laundry list of conditions meant to address neighbors' concerns.
Neighbors' decision to appeal that ruling sends the issue to the City Council.
"We get to make our presentation about why we think the Planning Commission failed to see that a parking lot would be detrimental to our neighborhood," Evans said.
In addition to concerns about crime and traffic, neighbors are worried about what the park and ride will mean to their property values, she said.
UTA spokesman Gerry Carpenter said the transit authority is mindful of the neighbors' concerns and is doing its best to address them.
"The goal and desire is to build something that not only works for the purposes of our regional transit system but also is something the neighborhood is comfortable with," Carpenter said.

Several design elements of the park and ride have been included specifically to address neighbors' concerns — including a bus loop that shares space with patron parking and keeps buses away from homes to the north, he said.
A large landscaped buffer for surrounding homes also is planned, as requested by residents, Carpenter said.
If the City Council sides with residents and determines the Planning Commission erred in its decision, UTA may have to settle for what Carpenter called "kiss and ride" — a place where people can be dropped off at the train station but not park.
But that would result in a loss of ridership and damage what Carpenter says is "an important part of our regional transportation system."
The Draper Transit Corridor is a 3.8-mile extension of the TRAX line that currently ends at 10000 South. The total cost of the project is estimated at $194 million. UTA has been recommended to receive a federal grant that would cover roughly $124 million of that price tag.
But the project is part of the $3.2 billion the Obama administration has committed to transit projects nationwide.
If Congress opts to trim that funding, the project would be delayed until another funding source is secured, Carpenter said. If all goes according to plan, the Draper line could be operational as soon as 2013.
Tuesday's City Council meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at Sandy City Hall, 10000 Centennial Parkway.

Monday, April 11, 2011

TOD - Do They Really Work?

Can transit-oriented development work along Wasatch Front?
April 11th, 2011 @ 12:46pm
By Jared Page
SANDY --A large wooden sign advertising one-, two- and three-bedroom lofts, condos and townhomes used to face the parking lot at Sandy Civic Center station.
It greeted commuters each morning as they parked their cars and boarded TRAX trains headed for Salt Lake City. When the workday was done and commuters returned to their cars, that same sign informed them, "You could be home now."
Today, that sign is gone, along with the possibility that Belmont Station will ever be home to anyone other than rodents, spiders and insects. The partially completed project was abandoned about three years ago when the developer's financing fell through.
"It's kind of like judging a kid's college potential based on his performance in kindergarten." - Reid Ewing
Eight miles to the north, just a short walk from the Murray North TRAX station, there's little activity at Hamlet Homes' residential and commercial development, Birkhill at Fireclay.
The project's street-level commercial leasing space sits vacant, aside from the developer's sales office and The Planning Center, a consulting firm for community and environmental planning and design.
Critics of transit-oriented development often point to the two projects as evidence that the new urbanism trend of building communities where people can work, live and play, with easy access to transit, just doesn't work along the Wasatch Front.
But professional planners and transit experts say that's neither true nor fair.
"It's kind of like judging a kid's college potential based on his performance in kindergarten," said Reid Ewing, a professor of city and metropolitan planning at the University of Utah. "It's got a lot of developing and growing to do before you can tell whether it's going to be successful."
Though most of them have been slowed — and in some cases stalled — by the Great Recession, several transit-oriented developments are in the works along the Utah Transit Authority's light- and commuter-rail lines.
City Creek an anomaly
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is creating the state's most high-profile transit-oriented development (TOD) — the $1.5 billion, 23-acre City Creek Center project.
"We're seeing huge development and all this new retail space ... because (City Creek Center) has a sponsor that didn't need to get a loan." -- John Taylor
Unlike other TODs under construction along the Wasatch Front, City Creek Center has been able to weather the recession because it has the financial backing of the LDS Church, said John Taylor, director of corporate services for Commerce Real Estate Solutions.
"It's an anomaly," Taylor said. "We're seeing huge development and all this new retail space in Salt Lake that you're not seeing anywhere else in the country. That's because (City Creek Center) has a sponsor that didn't need to get a loan."
The City Creek Center project construction in Salt Lake City is expected to be completed by March 22, 2012. Photo: Jeffrey D. Allred
Elsewhere, Farmington's 800,000-square-foot, mixed-use development Station Park is starting to take shape at the junction of I-15 and U.S. 89. Other TODs are in various stages of planning or development in Salt Lake City, Provo, Orem, Ogden, Clearfield, Layton, Sandy, Draper, Midvale, South Salt Lake and West Jordan — among others.
One of the main reasons they're moving forward, Taylor said, is TODs seem to have the support of banks, credit unions and other lenders.
"Those are the projects that people think they have the best opportunity of getting funding for, so those are the ones they're looking at," he said.
But they're not developing as quickly as builders and transit experts projected they would. Some point fingers at the economy, saying such developments would be thriving now if lenders hadn't gotten cold feet.
Others cite poor planning on specific projects, saying developers have tried to force uses — whether residential, retail, office or a mix of all three — in areas where they're not wanted or needed, simply because there's a TRAX or FrontRunner stop there.
Being forced to stop and consider those decisions, Taylor says, is "a healthy part of the slowdown in the economy."
To some extent, UTA officials agree with that assessment.
"There's no question that the economy really did slow down the idea of transit-oriented development," said Ryan McFarland, UTA's transit economic development manager. "But that's OK, because it gave us an opportunity to really get out there and plan. … Planning is critical. There are ways to make transit-oriented development successful."
UTA partners in projects
UTA has entered into agreements to partner in two TODs — a shopping center/office development on 31 acres near the future TRAX stop at 3200 W. 8650 South, West Jordan; and a 4-acre development at 3900 S. West Temple, where plans call for construction of a 60,000-square-foot Salt Lake Community College office and classroom building.
The transit authority also plans to partner in three other TODs — a massive 60-plus acre project in Clearfield featuring 3,500 residential units, 143,000 square feet of retail space and 107,000 square feet for office use; a 48-acre mixed-use development near the Sandy Civic Center TRAX station; and residential and retail projects adjacent to the planned Sugar House streetcar line.
"We won't have a Gateway-style magnitude at each location, but they'll be destinations in their own right." - Ryan McFarland
Action by the Utah Legislature in 2010 authorized UTA to enter into agreements with developers as a limited partner on up to five projects. Under SB272, the transit authority can contribute portions of land it owns around transit stations to a developer's project in exchange for a say in how to develop the land and a share of the profits.
"We really do want to see our stations become destinations," McFarland said. "Rather than selling our land off to a used-car lot, which really doesn't do a lot for transit, we'd really like to see destinations established at each one of these stations."
UTA officials say each "destination" will be different from the next. Not every site will be The Gateway — Salt Lake City's hub for shopping, dining and entertainment, easily accessed via TRAX.
"We won't have a Gateway-style magnitude at each location," McFarland said. "But they'll be destinations in their own right."
Station Park in Farmington, for example, will have a Harmons grocery store, as well as a 15-screen Cinemark theater and a variety of restaurants.
Perhaps as important as what each station has to offer is the ability to easily access other "destinations" along the light- and commuter-rail network, Ewing said.
The D Variables
When talking to students in his land-use and transportation class about what makes transit-oriented developments successful, the U. professor refers what are known as the "D variables."
One of the "D variables" is "destination accessibility," which takes into account how many attractions or jobs are accessible from a given site within 30 minutes.
Currently, the "destinations" using rail lines along the Wasatch Front are limited to downtown Salt Lake City and the University of Utah, Reid said.
"That's not awful, but it's not good," he said.
By 2015, that network will be expanded by 70 miles of rail along five lines, including an extension of FrontRunner from Salt Lake City to Provo. People will be able to take TRAX to Salt Lake City International Airport and several other areas of Salt Lake County.
"As the system becomes more complete, like adding the North Temple line (to the airport), you'll be able to reach more destinations, so destination accessibility will improve," Reid said.
The other "D variables" needed for a successful TOD, according to Reid, are "density," meaning more apartments and townhomes; "diversity" in the types of land uses, such as residential, retail and office; a "design" that is geared toward pedestrians; and a short "distance" to and from transit.
Most transit-oriented developments planned for the Wasatch Front possess many or all of those crucial variables, which gives Reid hope that those projects will be successful.
And he said it's far too early to grade transit-oriented development along the Wasatch Front or the success of a specific project.
Take Birkhill at Fireclay, for example. Only a fraction of the project has been developed as part of Murray's 97-acre Fireclay redevelopment area.
"How can you possibly judge a development that's going to have apartments, single-family homes, lots of retail and office (space) based on a single building? It just doesn't make sense," Reid said. "My sense is that Fireclay will be a pretty good TOD."
But Fireclay, like transit-oriented developments along the Wasatch Front as a whole, needs time to grow up, he said.
"Let's wait about 10 years until more of it is built and a lot more of the (transit) system is in place," Reid said. "It's going to be a whole different ballgame."

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

UTA proposes 3 years of fare increases - ksl.com

UTA proposes 3 years of fare increases
February 1st, 2011 @ 7:25pm
By ksl.com
SALT LAKE CITY -- The Utah Transit Authority has proposed a gradual increase for bus and transit fares, to keep pace with inflation over the next three years.
The change, which UTA is calling "modest," would take place each spring for three years -- making what is now a $2 bus or TRAX fare a $2.50 adult regular ticket by 2013.
UTA fares would be among top in US
Public hearings
Utah County - Feb. 15, 5:30 to 7 p.m., UCCU Center, Presidential South Suite, Utah Valley University, 800 W. University Parkway, Orem.
Davis County - Feb. 16, 5:30 to 7 p.m., Farmington City Hall, 160 S. Main, Farmington.
Salt Lake County - Feb. 17, 1 to 2:30 p.m., UTA offices, 669 W. 200 South, Salt Lake City.
Weber County - Feb. 17, 5:30 to 7 p.m., Commission Chambers, Weber County Building, 2380 Washington Blvd., Ogden.
Tooele County - Feb. 22, 5:30 to 7 p.m., Tooele County Courthouse, Auditorium, 47 S. Main, Tooele.
Salt Lake County - Feb. 23, 5:30 to 7 p.m., UTA offices, 669 W. 200 South, Salt Lake City.
Box Elder County - Feb. 24, 5:30 to 7 p.m., Brigham City Hall, Council chambers, 20 N. Main, Brigham City.
KSL News compared UTA's fares with those of systems of similar size and found the increase would put fares here among the top in the nation.
A $2.50 fare price is on par with Sacramento and higher than a number of other systems, including those in Portland, Denver, San Jose, Las Vegas and Phoenix, according to the American Public Transportation Association and various transit websites.
"It is true that we're on the high end, but we're also providing a greater service value for the fare amount," UTA spokesman Gerry Carpenter said Tuesday. "Our trips are typically longer. Instead of just a few blocks, people are traveling sometimes 20 or 30 miles. And that's a lot of value for your dollar."
For rider Jimmy Cardenas, the proposed new fare is too steep.
"Two dollars and 50 cents -- it's quite a bit when you're looking at only two hours for your ticket to run," Cardenas said.
"Even if you had to pay $3 it would be worth it," said Ron Sowerwine, of Salt Lake City, who said he has traveled on systems elsewhere like Washington D.C. and Las Vegas. "The TRAX system is marvelous. The bus system, they seem to be very punctual. I'm impressed with it."
UTA explains need for fare increase
According to APTA, thanks to a drop in state and local tax revenues because of the recession, more than 80 percent of U.S. transit systems have had to raise fares or cut services since 2009.
UTA's spokesman said the agency has lost $40 million in tax revenues over the last two years -- losses requiring layoffs and other belt tightening. Carpenter said those revenue drops are only part of the reason for the hike.
"Part of it is just increased operating costs," Carpenter said. "Every year our costs are a little bit more. Fuel prices have been a lot higher on average now than they have been historically."
Carpenter noted inflation is also a factor and the agency is expanding service to South Jordan and West Valley City as part of an ambitious seven-year building program.
A series of hearings will be held throughout February to provide more information and gather public comment on the proposal. Comments on the issue will be accepted from Feb. 1 to March 3. If approved by the UTA board of trustees, the changes would go into effect May 1.
"Our goal is to keep our fares reasonable while still asking our riders to contribute a fair share toward increased costs of operation," UTA General Manager Michael Allegra said in a prepared statement.
UTA Horizon discount program to be expanded
Along with the proposed fare increase, he said UTA plans to expand the Horizon discount fare program to meet the needs of the large population of low-income individuals and families who use the service.
If approved, the discount would increase from the current 16 percent to 25 percent off a regular adult monthly pass. UTA is also working with communities to change eligibility requirements, making the discount more widely available and helping more people qualify.
Beginning May 1, the base fare would increase by 25 cents. Next year, another 10 cents would be tacked on and in 2013, the full fare is proposed to be $2.50 for adult service on the local bus service and TRAX lines.
If approved, monthly pass charges would increase 25 percent in the three years, increasing $16.75 by 2013. Student access passes would see a 26 percent increase, increasing $13 to $62.75 a month.
The agency is also looking to raise the baseline for its fuel surcharge program, which adds up to a dollar to regular fares when fuel costs rise above certain parameters. The fuel surcharge has only needed to be used three times since it was established in 2008, and is consequently removed when fuel prices drop.
Instead of the current $3 threshold, UTA is proposing that the fuel surcharge not be implemented unless costs rise above $4 per gallon. Raising the baseline, UTA says, will recalibrate the program to activate at a more appropriate level.
-----
Story compiled with contributions from John Daley and Wendy Leonard.

Friday, January 7, 2011

Centerville's Main Street Plan?

Changes leave divide down Centerville’s Main St.
byJenniffer Wardell
Nov 21, 2010 | 590 views | 0 0 comments |  | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DOZENS attended Tuesday’s public hearing about the plan amendments, the second one held this month.
DOZENS attended Tuesday’s public hearing about the plan amendments, the second one held this month.
CENTERVILLE — Due to demand from city residents, there is now an invisible dividing line right down the middle of Main Street.

At their Nov. 16 meeting, the Centerville City Council responded to two days of impassioned public hearings on amendments to the city’s Main Street Plan by reducing the allowed height and number of possible residential units permitted for buildings on the street’s east side.

On the street’s west side, however, which back up against multiple-family rather than single family dwellings, the original heights and number of residential units remains the same.

“The council came up with a resolution that balanced what they heard from the community with principles of the planning process,” said Centerville City Community Development Director Cory Snyder. “The city went through a good process, with lots of public participation.”

The initial amendments to the plan, which eased height restrictions to 35 feet, will now max out at 25 feet on the street’s east side (the west side will remain 35 feet, but only with a conditional use permit).

The 35 feet height maximum is the same as has been allowed on both sides of the street by zoning that’s been in effect since the early 1990s.

The number of rental units in each building will be one to three on the east side, with four to six with a conditional use permit. On the west side, that number will be one to four per building, and five to eight with the permit.

The method to measure the buildings was also tweaked, with the top most point moving from the midpoint of a peaked roof to the very tip.

Single family homes were also added to the list of possible uses allowed on Main Street.

The amendments also removed some language from the plan that was seen by some as too friendly to public transportation.

“In my mind, we need to focus on the tweaks we need to make to alleviate some fears,” said Centerville City Mayor Ron Russell, after the hearing but before the final decision was made. “But it would be a terrible mistake to throw out what we have.”

At the most recent public hearing, which was a continuation of the one begun at the Nov. 2 city council meeting, the main fear expressed was that any changes to Main Street would cause Centerville to lose its residential feel.

“I keep hearing the words that we have no identity and that we need to make Main Street the heart of Centerville,” said resident Nancy Smith. “But for me, the heart of Centerville is each of the locally owned businesses. That’s what makes me want to shop there. That’s our vibrancy.”

There was also a considerable amount of worry over either the possibility that UDOT would widen Main Street, or that UTA was still considering bringing light rail through the same area.

“I went to a transportation summit recently where people were asking a UTA representative how to get light rail into their towns, and what they were telling these people was our Main Street plan,” said resident Robyn Mecham, specifying that the UTA doesn’t like parking lots near their stops. “I was shocked.”

Council member Justin Allen, who also sits on the Board of Trustees for the UTA, offered a different perspective.

“I think we can all rest assured that UTA has bigger fish to fry than buying small pieces of land in Centerville,” he said, adding that any density increase caused by the allowed rental units wouldn’t be anywhere near the numbers in the areas UTA is focusing on.

It was a worry about how specific the requirements of the landscaping areas would be, however, that most accurately showed the council’s desire to move forward.

“We haven’t even gotten to deciding on that part of the plan,” said Russell. “We’ve been too busy having discussions like these.”

jwardell@davisclipper.com


Read more:Davis County Clipper - Changes leave divide down Centerville’s Main St

Bus Changes in Davis County

Changes made to seven UTA routes in Davis
byMelinda Williams
Dec 15, 2010 | 495 views | 0 0 comments |  | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DAVIS COUNTY — Davis County commuters used to using bus service before 8:30 a.m. or after 9 p.m. on Saturday will now have to find other transportation.

That was one of the changes made to seven Utah Transit Authority routes, as part of a routine change day the transit agency has every April and December.

“We make these change day adjustments to routes to improve reliability, more accurately, they’re used as an opportunity to improve efficiencies,” said UTA spokesperson Gerry Carpenter. “We want to put the service where it is most needed, and eliminate trips with low ridership,” he said.

Route 473, the Salt Lake City to Ogden, U.S. 89 express route, has had the weekend southbound trip, leaving the Ogden Transit Center at 4:45 a.m., and the weekend northbound trip, leaving from the Komis and Wakara intersection in Salt Lake City cancelled. Arrival and departure times have also been adjusted to improve reliability.

Carpenter said the company wants riders to know a bus will arrive at a stop when it’s expected.

On Route 627, the Weber State University/Davis route, the 5:41 a.m. weekday trip to the Davis Applied Technology College , and the 6:15 a.m. trip to the Weber State University Davis campus have been cancelled due to low ridership.

Other changes have been made mainly to arrival and departure times to improve reliability.

The seven changes affecting bus service in Davis County were among many made throughout northern Utah.

Carpenter said UTA began notifying riders of the changes in November, and held an open house in Ogden to address all the changes then. Flyers were also posted on all area buses and at affected stops.

Carpenter said that as the economy improves, UTA hopes to expand its services.

A complete list of all changes can be found at www.rideuta.com/change day.

mwilliams@davisclipper.com


Read more:Davis County Clipper - Changes made to seven UTA routes in Davis

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Mayor Becker's Top Priority Streetcars?

S70-Concept-Streetcar.jpg
Streetcar success reflects state of Salt Lake City
January 4th, 2011 @ 8:04pm
By Jared Page
SALT LAKE CITY -- Ralph Becker left most of his trophies on the shelf Tuesday night, preferring to showcase the one he says best reflects the state of Salt Lake City.
Departing from the traditional listing of accomplishments, Becker kept his State of the City address short and focused on the future by highlighting one of his administration's top priorities of 2010: the Sugar House streetcar.
"This project reflects -- in style and in substance -- the goals, values and priorities we have set for our great city," Becker said during his speech at the Salt Lake City-County Building. "It exemplifies our continued commitment to move Salt Lake City forward despite challenging economic conditions."
It's also an example of how Becker's collaborative approach to leading Utah's capital city has allowed his administration to accomplish lofty and bold goals.
"To achieve the successes we want, we must have the confidence to involve everyone with a stake in the outcome and a shared vision to help us achieve our goals," he said. "We cannot go it alone as a municipality."
Becker recalled standing on the abandoned railway at the corner of McClelland Street and Sugarmont Drive in October 2007 and declaring that he would work toward bringing a streetcar to the area during his first term in office.
At the time, Becker insisted that by working together with the Utah Transit Authority and South Salt Lake, a two-mile streetcar line from the 2100 South TRAX station to the old Granite Furniture building could move forward much sooner than what then was a 20- to 25-year timetable.
This October, Becker was back on that street corner, this time celebrating a $26 million federal grant that will allow construction of the Sugar House streetcar project to begin by the end of 2011 and be operational as soon as 2013.
Becker next wants to bring streetcars back to downtown, a project that recently got a $500,000 boost from the federal government to supplement planning work that already has been completed.
"As our work to strengthen partnerships and livability in Salt Lake City continues, our path forward is informed by both our vision for the future and the accomplishments of the past," the mayor said.
The streetcar project, Becker said, continues the city's goal of livability -- the focus of his State of the City address a year ago. The streetcar line will be integrated with Parleys Trail, and the city plans to build incentives into mixed-use and more dense development of the area, he said.
"The Sugar House streetcar won't be just a transit line," Becker said. "It will be a wonderful asset in one of our most treasured neighborhoods. ... The Sugar House area will be enhanced as a 'destination neighborhood,' with bikeways and trails, locally-owned eclectic small businesses, restaurants, shops and a wide array of housing options."
Becker credited the city's "talented and committed leadership and employees" with enabling the city to move forward on projects such as the Sugar House streetcar despite challenging economic times.
"While much has been accomplished, there is much more to do to help Salt Lake City achieve its potential as a Great American City," he said. "... My commitment to (the City Council) and to our residents, businesses and visitors, is to continue to work together ... to produce the results that make Salt Lake City so livable, unique and prepared for the future."
CLICK HERE to read Mayor Becker's address in its entirety.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

FrontRunner Making Money for the State?

FrontRunner nets state $16.5 million reimbursement
byMelinda Williams
Dec 30, 2010 | 71 views | 0 0 comments |  | 1 1 recommendations | email to a friend | print
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT recently gave the state a reimbursement for FrontRunner’s construction. The train started running in April 2008. Photo: Ron Brown
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT recently gave the state a reimbursement for FrontRunner’s construction. The train started running in April 2008. Photo: Ron Brown
DAVIS COUNTY — Davis County residents and others have been riding the FrontRunner commuter train since April 2008.

Now, the federal government is giving the state a $16.5 million reimbursement for the rail’s construction.

The money was part of $37 million for two rail projects funded under the federal government’s New Starts grants program for work already completed. The payment was announced Monday by U.S. Transportation Ray LaHood and Federal Transit Administrator Peter Rogoff.

The payments were for the FrontRunner Salt Lake City to Ogden commuter rail line and $20.623 million for the Mid-Jordan TRAX light rail project — both projects already completed and represent federal dollars previously committed to the projects under fill funding grant agreements.

“These advance payments are deeply appreciated and come at a time when they can be the most helpful,” said Michael Allegra, UTA general manager. “By freeing up local funds, it allows us to apply more resources toward completing our other rail projects.”

FrontRunner is a 44-mile, eight-station rail line between Salt Lake City and Pleasant view in Weber County. It cost $611.7 million to construct, with a federal New Starts Share of $489.4 million.

The Mid-Jordan line is a 10.6 mile light rail line that will connect to the Sandy/Salt Lake TRAX line at 6400 South (Fashion Place Mall). It cost $535.4 million, with a federal New Starts Share of $428.3 million. The new line will begin operations in August 2011.

Other UTA projects under construction include light rail extensions to the Salt Lake International Airport, West Valley City and Draper and a 45-mile extension of commuter rail from Salt Lake City to Provo.

For more information on UTA projects, visit www.rideuta.com.


Read more:Davis County Clipper - FrontRunner nets state 16 5 million reimbursement

Monday, December 27, 2010

UTA Receives Federal Funding Earlier Than Expected

TRAX_UPDATE_3.jpg
UTA receives federal funding earlier than expected
December 27th, 2010 @ 2:31pm
By Wendy Leonard
SALT LAKE CITY — The Federal Transit Administration announced Monday that it will advance a total of $182.4 million in New Starts funding to help with seven projects already underway in five states, including in Salt Lake.
Utah is expected to get more than $37 million for two separate projects.
"By making these payments now, we're not only fulfilling the federal government's commitment to these projects sooner, but we're also giving a well-timed boost to communities that have made an important investment in their transportation infrastructure," U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a press release Monday.
The monies are being paid out earlier than originally expected because of unallocated, left-over funds in the FTA's fiscal year 2010 budget for new construction.
The Utah Transit Authority can now use the extra cash for other projects, including the West Valley and airport TRAX linesFrontRunner extension to Provo and the planning of a Draper-Sandy TRAX route.
"These advance payments are deeply appreciated and come at a time when they can be the most helpful," said UTA General Manager Michael Allegra. "By freeing up local funds, it allows us to apply more resources toward completing our other rail projects."
More than $20 million is slated to help the UTA pay for the 10.6-mile Mid-Jordan TRAX line, which will join the existing Sandy line at 6400 South, providing a direct connection to the Salt Lake City central business district, the University of Utah and other Wasatch destinations.
The line, which will be completed in August 2011, is expected to carry 9,500 daily passengers by 2030, helping to reduce highway congestion and pollution. The project will cost a total of $535.4 million, with a federal New Starts share of $428.3 million committed to the project.
FrontRunner, which spans 44 miles and connects eight stations from Salt Lake City to Ogden, will get $16.5 million now, as part of New Starts expected contributions of $489.4 million for the $611.7 million project. The line currently has more than 5,100 daily riders and is expected to serve nearly 12,000 weekday riders by 2025.
Other projects receiving funding from the FTA include light rail routes in Dallas, commuter rail and subway projects in New York City, train lines in Northern Virginia and light rail extensions in Seattle.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Salt Lake City awarded grant for downtown streetcar study - ksl.com

streetcar_shutterstock.jpg
Salt Lake City awarded grant for downtown streetcar study
December 21st, 2010 @ 7:52pm
By Jared Page
SALT LAKE CITY — The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City has been awarded a $470,000 federal grant to study options for a downtown streetcar system.
The Salt Lake City project was among 24 selected to receive a share of $25.7 million from the Federal Transit Administration. The funds will help Salt Lake City explore alignment options and operating concepts for a downtown streetcar system.
"With a daytime population that doubles every day, the City Creek development under way and the expansive growth of our downtown core in Salt Lake City, the timing of this funding to increase our transit options couldn't be better." -Mayor Ralph Becker
Mayor Ralph Becker said the funding allows Utah's capital city to take a "giant step" toward development of a streetcar system and provide more transit options for residents and visitors.
"With a daytime population that doubles every day, the City Creek development under way and the expansive growth of our downtown core in Salt Lake City, the timing of this funding to increase our transit options couldn't be better," Becker said in a news release.
Analysis of the streetcar system will be conducted by a technical advisory team that includes the city's divisions of transportation, engineering, housing and urban development, planning, sustainability and economic development, as well as the Utah Transit Authority.
The study area encompasses the section of downtown bordered by 500 East, 600 West, South Temple and 900 South.

Monday, December 6, 2010

Streetcar on display in downtown Salt Lake City

Streetcar on display in downtown Salt Lake City
December 5th, 2010 @ 5:03pm
By Marjorie Cortez
SALT LAKE CITY -- A gleaming red, white and blue streetcar pulled into Salt Lake Sunday -- atop a semi-trailer -- as a demonstration of possible transit options in downtown Salt Lake City.
The streetcar, manufactured by United Streetcar in Clackamas, Ore., was on display at the Gallivan Center for public tours. The car, about 66 feet long and 9 feet wide, can carry up to 170 passengers. The top speed for the electrical-powered vehicle is about 44 mph.
"What communities across the country are finding now (is that) bringing streetcars back into their communities is an excellent way to reinvigorate their downtowns and their adjacent neighborhoods to create a very pedestrian, lively, vital environment," said Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency director DJ Baxter.
In Portland, streetcars have significantly contributed to economic development along their lines, some $3.5 billion over the past decade, said Corey Yraguen, president of Oregon Iron Works, of which United Streetcar is a subsidiary.
Unlike light rail systems, such as Utah Transit Authority's TRAX system, streetcars make more frequent stops. "Street cars are integral to moving people around the city," Yraguen said.
Streetcars are fully accessible to people with disabilities. They are able to plow snow and drop sand if needed. This particular car had also been on display in Boston, Fort Worth and Cincinnati.
In October, UTA and city officials announced that a $26 million federal grant had been awarded to move forward with a streetcar project in Sugar House. The proposed 2-mile line will run from the old Granite Furniture building to the 2100 South TRAX station.